Google Gemini and Bard artificial intelligence chatbot performance in ophthalmology knowledge assessment.

PURPOSE: With the popularization of ChatGPT (Open AI, San Francisco, California, United States) in recent months, understanding the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in a medical context is important. Our study aims to evaluate Google Gemini and Bard's (Google, Mountain View, California, United States) knowledge in ophthalmology. METHODS: In this study, we evaluated Google Gemini and Bard's performance on EyeQuiz, a platform containing ophthalmology board certification examination practice questions, when used from the United States (US). Accuracy, response length, response time, and provision of explanations were evaluated. Subspecialty-specific performance was noted. A secondary analysis was conducted using Bard from Vietnam, and Gemini from Vietnam, Brazil, and the Netherlands. RESULTS: Overall, Google Gemini and Bard both had accuracies of 71% across 150 text-based multiple-choice questions. The secondary analysis revealed an accuracy of 67% using Bard from Vietnam, with 32 questions (21%) answered differently than when using Bard from the US. Moreover, the Vietnam version of Gemini achieved an accuracy of 74%, with 23 (15%) answered differently than the US version of Gemini. While the Brazil (68%) and Netherlands (65%) versions of Gemini performed slightly worse than the US version, differences in performance across the various country-specific versions of Bard and Gemini were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Google Gemini and Bard had an acceptable performance in responding to ophthalmology board examination practice questions. Subtle variability was noted in the performance of the chatbots across different countries. The chatbots also tended to provide a confident explanation even when providing an incorrect answer.

Adaptive Optics Imaging in Diabetic Retinopathy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation between diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity and microscopic retinal and vascular alterations using adaptive optics imaging (AOI). METHODS: In this single-center, prospective cohort study, adult participants with healthy eyes or DR underwent AOI. Participants were classified into control/mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR), moderate/severe NPDR, and proliferative DR. AOI using the RTX1 camera was obtained from 48 participants (87 eyes) for photoreceptor data, and from 36 participants (62 eyes) for vascular data. RESULTS: Photoreceptor parameters significantly differed between DR groups at 2° and 4° of retinal eccentricity. Wall-to-lumen ratio varied significantly at 2° eccentricity, while other vascular parameters remained non-significant. Cone density and dispersion were the strongest predictors for DR severity (p<0.001) in multivariable generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling, while other vascular parameters remained non-significant between DR severity groups. All photoreceptor parameters showed significant correlations with visual acuity overall and across most DR severity groups. CONCLUSION: To date, this is one of the largest studies evaluating the use of AOI in DR. AOI was demonstrated to differentiate between various levels of disease severity in DR. These results support the potential role in diagnostic and therapeutic microstructural evaluation in research and clinical practice.

SURGICAL DRAINAGE METHODS DURING PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety outcomes of subretinal fluid drainage methods during pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. METHODS: A systematic search strategy was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and October 2022. Included studies reported on either the safety or efficacy of two or more drainage methods during pars plana vitrectomy for patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. RESULTS: Two randomized and five observational studies consisting of 1,524 eyes were included. Best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation and primary reattachment rates were similar across groups. A significantly lower risk of epiretinal membrane formation was associated with draining subretinal fluid through preexisting retinal breaks (risk ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = [0.60, 0.83], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%) or with perfluorocarbon liquid (risk ratios = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = [0.59, 0.83], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%) compared with posterior retinotomy. The risk of an abnormal foveal contour was significantly greater in perfluorocarbon liquid-treated eyes relative to posterior retinotomy (risk ratios = 1.56, 95% confidence interval = [1.13, 2.17], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in the final best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation and primary reattachment rates across different drainage methods. There remains limited information on the topic, so future research is warranted.

Preoperative Visual Acuity Thresholds in Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This review consolidates findings from studies that used a preoperative visual acuity (VA) threshold as an indication for epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery. METHODS: The literature was systematically searched using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to October 2022 to select studies reporting on pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for ERM that used a preoperative VA threshold as an inclusion criterion. Primary outcomes were final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and change in BCVA relative to baseline. Secondary outcomes included risk of intra- and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 639 eyes from seven studies were included. The most liberal preoperative VA threshold was 20/28.5 or worse, whereas the most conservative threshold was worse than 20/60. The mean preoperative BCVA was 0.55 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (∼20/70), and the mean postoperative BCVA was 0.35 logMAR (∼20/45). Generally, VA improved relative to baseline, regardless of the preoperative VA threshold. The smallest improvement in VA was observed in a study where the pre-operative VA to consider surgery was liberal (20/30 or worse), whereas the greatest VA improvement was observed in a study that used a conservative preoperative VA threshold (worse than 20/60). CONCLUSIONS: The greatest improvement in BCVA was observed in studies where a conservative pre-operative VA threshold was used. The decision to operate should involve a patient-centered approach with a thorough discussion of the risks and benefits of PPV, regardless of the preoperative VA threshold used. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:xx-xx.].

38-Gauge Cannula-Based Endo-Drainage of Posteriorly Trapped Intraoperative Subretinal Fluid During Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment.

The DRAIN STUDY evaluated a novel use of a 38-gauge Polytip® cannula for posteriorly trapped intraoperative subretinal fluid endo-drainage during pars plana vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Sixteen patients underwent this procedure, with an 81% single surgery success rate at 3 months postoperatively. Median visual acuity improved from 20/300 to 20/80. Two cases developed cystoid macular edema and epiretinal membrane. No postoperative residual subretinal fluid was observed. The 38-gauge cannula-based SRF drainage proved effective, offering an alternative to conventional methods for managing posteriorly trapped intraoperative subretinal fluid.

Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot's Interpretation of Clinical Ophthalmic Images.

Importance: Ophthalmology is reliant on effective interpretation of multimodal imaging to ensure diagnostic accuracy. The new ability of ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI) to interpret ophthalmic images has not yet been explored. Objective: To evaluate the performance of the novel release of an artificial intelligence chatbot that is capable of processing imaging data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a publicly available dataset of ophthalmic cases from OCTCases, a medical education platform based out of the Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences at the University of Toronto, with accompanying clinical multimodal imaging and multiple-choice questions. Across 137 available cases, 136 contained multiple-choice questions (99%). Exposures: The chatbot answered questions requiring multimodal input from October 16 to October 23, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the accuracy of the chatbot in answering multiple-choice questions pertaining to image recognition in ophthalmic cases, measured as the proportion of correct responses. χ2 Tests were conducted to compare the proportion of correct responses across different ophthalmic subspecialties. Results: A total of 429 multiple-choice questions from 136 ophthalmic cases and 448 images were included in the analysis. The chatbot answered 299 of multiple-choice questions correctly across all cases (70%). The chatbot's performance was better on retina questions than neuro-ophthalmology questions (77% vs 58%; difference = 18%; 95% CI, 7.5%-29.4%; χ21 = 11.4; P < .001). The chatbot achieved a better performance on nonimage-based questions compared with image-based questions (82% vs 65%; difference = 17%; 95% CI, 7.8%-25.1%; χ21 = 12.2; P < .001).The chatbot performed best on questions in the retina category (77% correct) and poorest in the neuro-ophthalmology category (58% correct). The chatbot demonstrated intermediate performance on questions from the ocular oncology (72% correct), pediatric ophthalmology (68% correct), uveitis (67% correct), and glaucoma (61% correct) categories. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the recent version of the chatbot accurately responded to approximately two-thirds of multiple-choice questions pertaining to ophthalmic cases based on imaging interpretation. The multimodal chatbot performed better on questions that did not rely on the interpretation of imaging modalities. As the use of multimodal chatbots becomes increasingly widespread, it is imperative to stress their appropriate integration within medical contexts.

Validation of M-CHARTS for Quantitative Assessment of Metamorphopsia Following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair.

PURPOSE: To validate the quantitative assessment of metamorphopsia in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment(RRD) using M-CHARTS by determining its correlation with subjective reporting of metamorphopsia with a validated metamorphopsia questionnaire(modified MeMoQ). METHODS: Research Ethics Board approved, prospective observational study carried out at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. Patients with primary, unilateral RRD and healthy controls were included. Metamorphopsia at 3-months was assessed with modified MeMoQ and M-CHARTS. RESULTS: 100 patients(50 with RRD,50 controls) were included. 70%(35/50) of the RRD group had metamorphopsia with M-CHARTS and 80%(40/50) with MeMoQ. The modified MeMoQ and total M-CHARTS scores were significantly higher in patients with RRD compared to controls(p<0.0001). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.934 in the RRD group. Horizontal, vertical, and total M-CHARTS scores were significantly correlated with MeMoQ scores(rs=0.465,p=0.0007;rs=0.405,p=0.004;rs=0.475,p=0.0005,respectively). M-CHARTS was 72.7% sensitive and 94.6% specific for detection of metamorphopsia(positive score≥0.2), with an area under the ROC curve=0.801. A stronger correlation was found in patients who scored ≥0.2 on the M-CHARTS and reported metamorphopsia with the MeMoQ(rs=0.454,p=0.001). CONCLUSION: We have validated M-CHARTS as a tool to quantitatively assess metamorphopsia in patients with RRD, which is significantly correlated with patient-reported outcomes using the metamorphopsia questionnaire(MeMoQ). A total score of ≥0.2 with M-CHARTS was more strongly correlated with MeMoQ.

Association Between Sociodemographic Factors and Self-reported Glaucoma in the National Health Interview Survey: A Population-Based Analysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between social determinants of health (SDH) in the domains of social and community context, education access, environmental context, economic stability, and healthcare access, with glaucoma prevalence. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study population consisted of adult participants who answered glaucoma-related questions on the 2017 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), the most recent iteration that includes glaucoma-related questions. The main outcome measures included the relationships between SDH-related factors and self-reported glaucoma diagnosis as well as self-reported glaucomatous vision loss were examined using univariable and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: In total, 26,696 of 26,742 (99.83%) NHIS respondents were included, of whom 880 (3.30%) reported a glaucoma diagnosis and 275 (1.03%) reported glaucomatous vision loss. Participants were predominantly middle-aged (50.95 ± 18.60 years), female (54.75%), and non-Hispanic White (70.49%). In age-adjusted multivariable regression (n = 25,456), non-Hispanic Black race (odds ratio [OR] = 1.87, 99% CI = [1.37, 2.55], P < .001, compared to non-Hispanic White race) and poor health status (OR = 1.54, 99% CI = [1.00, 2.37], P = .01, compared to good health status) were significant predictors of glaucoma diagnosis. For glaucomatous vision loss, having an income below the poverty threshold (OR = 2.41, 99% CI = [1.12, 5.20], P = .003, compared to income ≥5 times the poverty threshold) was the only significant predictor in univariable analyses. No SDH-related factors were significantly associated with glaucomatous vision loss in multivariable analysis (n = 848). Multicollinearity was minimal (variation inflation factor<1.6 for all independent variables). CONCLUSIONS: Non-Hispanic Black race and poor health status were associated with self-reported glaucoma diagnosis. Physicians and policymakers may consider SDH when assessing clinical risk and designing public health interventions.

PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEEL FOR MACULAR HOLE: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for macular hole (MH). METHODS: A systematic literature search on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed from January 2000 to 2023. The primary outcome was the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcomes included MH closure rates and the need for repeat surgery. The authors performed a random-effects meta-analysis on Review Manager 5.4. RESULTS: Fourteen studies on 880 eyes were included. Pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel achieved a similar final BCVA ( P = 0.66). However, pars plana vitrectomy without ILM peeling achieved a significantly better final BCVA in eyes with closed MHs (WMD = 0.05 logMAR, 95% CI, 0.01-0.10, P = 0.02). Pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling achieved a significantly higher primary MH closure rate (RR = 1.21, 95% CI, 1.04-1.42, P = 0.02) and lower incidence of MH reoperation (RR = 0.19, 95% CI, 0.11-0.33, P < 0.001). The final MH closure rate ( P = 0.12) and incidence of MH recurrence ( P = 0.25) were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel achieved a similar final BCVA. However, pars plana vitrectomy without ILM peeling achieved a better final BCVA in eyes with closed MHs. ILM peeling achieved a greater primary MH closure rate and reduced need for reoperation.

Impact of Baseline Morphologic Stage of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment on Postoperative Visual Acuity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of baseline morphologic stage of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) using OCT with postoperative anatomic and visual acuity (VA) outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Consecutive primary fovea-involving RRDs referred from January 2012 to September 2022. METHODS: Patients with primary RRD and no prior macular pathology with gradable baseline OCT were assessed. Best-corrected VA (BCVA) was assessed at presentation and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. OCT scans were graded for parafoveal morphologic stage of RRD and foveal photoreceptor integrity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association of morphologic stage of RRD with 12-month BCVA. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-one patients were included. Sixty-eight percent (238/351) were male, the mean (standard deviation) age was 61.2 (± 12.8) years, and 59% (206/351) were phakic. Thirteen percent (47/351) presented in stages 1 and 2, 15% (54/351) in stage 3a, 36% (126/351) in stage 3b, 24% (83/351) in stage 4, and 12% (41/351) in stage 5. Increasing stage was associated with worse foveal photoreceptor integrity, reduced baseline BCVA and longer duration of central vision loss (P < 0.001). Mean (standard deviation) 12-month BCVA by stage was 0.77 (± 0.64) for stages 1 and 2, 1.00 (± 0.53) for stage 3a, 1.36 (± 0.55) for stage 3b, 1.33 (± 0.66) for stage 4 and 1.55 (± 0.47) for stage 5. Increasing stage was associated with reduced postoperative BCVA (P < 0.001) at all time points after adjusting for covariates. A subgroup analysis of acute detachments with retinal pigment epithelium-photoreceptor dysregulation demonstrated no difference in postoperative BCVA between stages 1, 2, and 3a. However, 12-month BCVA was significantly better in stages 1, 2, and 3a vs. stage 3b (P = 0.002) and stage 3a vs. 3b (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the clinical relevance of a recently proposed OCT-based staging system for outer retinal morphologic changes over time in RRD. Postoperative BCVA was significantly reduced in patients with worse presenting stage at all time points. In acute RRDs, 12-month BCVA was significantly better in stages 1, 2, and 3a vs. stage 3b, which suggests early stages may have better retinal recovery compared with stage 3b or worse. Stage 3b may represent a critical point where substantial structural changes occur, leading to worse outcomes in acute RRDs. Patients presenting with fovea-involving RRDs in stages 1, 2, or 3a may benefit from more urgent intervention. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Relationship Between Disease and Treatment Factors in Diabetes With Vision Difficulty: A Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Relationships between disease and treatment factors of diabetes and vision difficulty remain largely unknown. This study investigated the relationship between disease and treatment factors in diabetes and participants' self-reported vision difficulty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, population-based analysis. Data from the National Health Interview Survey was used and analyzed through univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: From the 29,464 included participants, logistic regression showed increased odds of self-reported vision difficulty among participants with diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 2.14, P < 0.001), prediabetes (OR = 1.95, P < 0.001), or gestational diabetes (OR = 1.54, P < 0.001) compared to participants without diabetes. Those who reported having diabetes for more than a year had higher odds of vision difficulty (OR = 1.97, P = 0.02), as did those who were taking insulin (OR = 1.62, P < 0.001), those who had taken less insulin to save money within the past year (OR = 1.87, P = 0.01), and those who reported experiencing diabetes-related stress (OR = 2.14, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Duration of diabetes, diabetes-related stress, and taking less insulin than recommended to save money were associated with vision difficulty. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:142-153.].

POSTOPERATIVE PHOTORECEPTOR INTEGRITY AND ANATOMICAL OUTCOMES BASED ON PRESENTING MORPHOLOGIC STAGE OF RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate outer retinal recovery on postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) based on presenting morphologic stage of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). METHODS: Retrospective cohort of consecutive primary fovea-involving RRDs, referred from January 2012 to September 2022. Baseline OCTs were assessed for morphologic stage of RRD. Postoperative OCT scans were graded at 3, 6, and 12 months for external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone and interdigitation zone discontinuity, epiretinal membrane formation and severity, and residual subfoveal fluid. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-one patients were included. Increasing baseline morphologic stage of RRD was significantly associated with external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone, and interdigitation zone discontinuity at all time points postoperatively ( P < 0.001) and was shown to be an independent predictor of foveal photoreceptor integrity after adjusting for height of detachment, time to surgery, and duration of fovea involvement ( P < 0.001). Earlier stages were associated with residual subfoveal fluid ( P < 0.001). There was no association between the stages of RRD and epiretinal membrane severity. However, late stages presented with earlier development of epiretinal membrane ( P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Increasing morphologic stage of RRD is associated with delayed recovery of outer retinal bands in the first year and faster development of epiretinal membrane after RRD repair. The results of this study suggest that the stages may serve as a prognostic biomarker for postoperative photoreceptor recovery.

Systemic Arterial and Venous Thrombotic Events Associated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the risk of systemic arteriovenous thrombotic events between intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and sham injections. DESIGN: Random-effects meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 2005 to August 2023. Our inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on systemic arteriovenous events for standard dose intravitreal anti-VEGF agents for any indication. RESULTS: A total of 20 RCTs reporting on 12,833 eyes were included. There was no significant difference in the risk of any thrombotic event between bevacizumab 1.25 mg and ranibizumab 0.5 mg (Risk ratio (RR) = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.52-1.75, P = .89). There was no significant difference between bevacizumab and ranibizumab when restricting to arterial thrombotic events (RR= 0.88, 95% CI = 0.60-1.30, P = .53) or venous thrombotic events (RR = 1.99, 95% CI =86 0.68-5.82], P = .21). The risk of arterial thrombotic events was similar between aflibercept and bevacizumab (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.60-2.07, P = .74), between aflibercept and ranibizumab (RR= 0.77, 95% CI = 0.49-1.21, P = .26), between brolucizumab and aflibercept (RR= 0.67, 95% CI = 0.32-1.38, P = .27), and between aflibercept and faricimab (RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.43-2.17, P = .93). Compared to sham, neither dose of ranibizumab (0.5 mg or 0.3 mg) showed a higher risk of arterial thrombotic events. CONCLUSIONS: There was a similar risk of systemic arteriovenous thrombotic adverse events between anti-VEGF agents and between ranibizumab and sham injections.

The ability of artificial intelligence chatbots ChatGPT and Google Bard to accurately convey pre-operative information for patients undergoing ophthalmological surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: To determine whether the two popular artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, ChatGPT and Bard, provide high-quality information concerning procedure description, risks, benefits, and alternatives of various ophthalmological surgeries. METHODS: ChatGPT and Bard were prompted with questions pertaining to the description, potential risks, benefits, alternatives, and implications of not proceeding with various surgeries in different subspecialties of ophthalmology. Six common ophthalmic procedures were included in our analysis. Two comprehensive ophthalmologists and one sub-specialist graded each response independently using a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Likert grading for accuracy was significantly higher for ChatGPT in comparison to Bard (4.5±0.6 vs 3.8±0.8, p<0.0001). Generally, ChatGPT performed better than Bard even when questions were stratified by type of ophthalmological surgery. There was no significant difference between ChatGPT and Bard for response length (2104.7±271.4 characters vs 2441.0±633.9 characters, p=0.12). ChatGPT responded significantly slower than Bard (46.0±3.0 seconds vs 6.6±1.2 seconds, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Both ChatGPT and Bard may offer accessible and high-quality information relevant to the informed consent process for various ophthalmic procedures. Nonetheless, both AI chatbots overlooked probability of adverse events, hence limiting their potential and introducing patients to information that may be difficult to interpret.

Two-year outcomes of different subretinal fluid drainage techniques during vitrectomy for fovea-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: ELLIPSOID-2 Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to compare visual acuity, complications and outer retinal integrity following subretinal fluid (SRF) drainage from the peripheral retinal breaks (PRBs) versus posterior retinotomy (PR) versus perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) at 2 years post-surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 300 consecutive patients with primary RRD undergoing 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with SRF drainage through (1) PRB (n=100), (2) PR (n=100) or (3) with PFCL (n=100). Primary outcomes were visual acuity (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)) and complications (cystoid macular oedema (CMO) and epiretinal membrane (ERM)). Secondary outcomes were discontinuity of the external limiting membrane (ELM), ellipsoid zone (EZ) and interdigitation zone (IDZ) at 2 years post-surgery. RESULTS: Mean (±SD) logMAR BCVA at 24 months was better in the PRB compared with PR and PFCL, with PFCL having the worst BCVA (PRB 0.5±0.6; PR 0.7±0.5; PFCL 0.9±0.7, p=0.001). CMO was higher with PFCL (PRB 29.7%; PR 30.2%; PFCL 45.9%, p=0.0015) and ERM formation was higher in PR (PRB 62.6%; PR 93.0%; PFCL 68.9%, p=0.002). There were no differences in ELM or EZ discontinuity. However, IDZ discontinuity was higher in PFCL (PRB 34%; PR 27%; PFCL 46%, p=0.002) at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity was worse and discontinuity of the IDZ and CMO was greater in eyes with PFCL-assisted drainage compared with PRB or PR. Drainage technique may impact long-term visual acuity and photoreceptor integrity.